Accessibilità digitale nel 2026
Download the then accessibility guide

User research: how to truly understand users and needs?

Summary

Everyone says they do it, almost nobody uses it to decide. In practice user research often ends up as two interviews at the start or a usability test when the project is already closed.

Used well, it serves to reduce uncertainty and to align teams and stakeholders on evidence instead of opinions.

Which methods exist and when each is worthwhile, how to make qualitative and quantitative work together without having to choose one, and the mistakes that keep research far from decisions.

Contents

User Research is one of the most cited activities in Experience Design, but also one of the most misunderstood. Everyone says they do it, few really use it as a decision-making tool. It is often reduced to a series of preliminary interviews or to usability tests when the project is almost finished. In reality, User Research is much more: it is the strategic foundation on which to build products, services and experiences that are sustainable over time.

In a context where the digital offering is ever wider and users’ expectations ever higher, designing without research means increasing risk, slowing innovation and wasting resources. User Research is there for exactly this: to reduce uncertainty, align teams and stakeholders and guide decisions based on real evidence, not hypotheses.

In this article we analyze User Research in a thorough, pragmatic way: what it really is, why it is central to UX, CX and EX, which methods to use, how to combine qualitative and quantitative and how to turn data into insights useful for the project and the business.

What User Research is (beyond the definition)

User Research is the structured set of activities that make it possible to understand the behaviors, needs, expectations and mental models of the people who interact with a product or a service. It is not limited to collecting feedback, but builds shared knowledge to guide design choices, roadmap priorities and investments.

According to Nielsen Norman Group, User Research aims to study users in order to design solutions that are useful, usable and desirable. Three keywords that describe its value well:

  • Useful, because it answers a real need
  • Usable, because it is easy to understand and use
  • Desirable, because it generates perceived value

Without research, these three aspects often remain assumptions.

Why User Research is a strategic lever today

User Research has become strategic because the context has changed. Products no longer compete only on features, but on the quality of the overall experience. Every friction, every misunderstanding, every choice not aligned with real needs has a direct impact on conversions, retention and reputation.

Investing in User Research means:

  • Reducing design risk, avoiding useless or wrong solutions
  • Speeding up decisions, because they are based on shared evidence
  • Aligning multidisciplinary teams, creating a common language
  • Improving business KPIs, such as conversion rate, churn and customer satisfaction

As also stressed in the Interaction Design Foundation frameworks, research is not an isolated phase, but an ongoing activity that accompanies the whole product life cycle.

User Research, UX, CX and EX: a single system

A common mistake is confining User Research to UX alone. In reality, research on users is the connection point between User Experience, Customer Experience and Employee Experience.

  • In UX, User Research guides information architecture, flows and interactions
  • In CX, it makes it possible to understand the end-to-end experience along the customer journey
  • In EX, it helps design more effective internal processes and tools

The Experience Management platforms analyzed by Qualtrics and Medallia clearly show how the quality of experience can be measured only starting from a deep understanding of people, whether customers or employees.

Qualitative and quantitative research: stop choosing

Mature User Research does not set qualitative against quantitative, but integrates them. The two approaches answer different, complementary questions.

Qualitative research: understanding the “why”

Qualitative research is used to explore in depth:

  • latent needs
  • motivations
  • expectations
  • mental models

Typical methods include:

  • User interviews
  • Contextual observation
  • Diary studies
  • Moderated usability tests
  • Co-design workshops

It is fundamental in exploratory phases and when you want to discover problems users do not even know they have.

Quantitative research: measuring and validating

Quantitative research makes it possible to:

  • validate hypotheses at scale
  • measure phenomena over time
  • compare alternatives

This area includes surveys, analytics, A/B tests and experience metrics such as NPS, CSAT and CES. The greatest value is obtained when the quantitative comes from qualitative insights and not from generic questions.

The main User Research methods (and when to really use them)

Each method only makes sense if it answers a clear goal.

User interviews
Ideal for exploring problems, context and expectations. They are not for validating solutions, but for understanding people.

Usability tests
Fundamental for finding concrete friction in the interaction. They work best on prototypes or existing products.

Surveys
Useful for measuring phenomena and validating patterns that emerged from qualitative research.

Expert review
Effective for finding obvious usability and accessibility problems, especially in audit or pre-test phases.

The quality of User Research does not depend on the number of methods, but on the consistency between goals, method and decisions to be made.

From research to insights: where value is born

The real value of User Research lies not in collecting data, but in its interpretation. An insight is not an interesting quote, but a structured reading that links behavior, motivation and design impact.

A good insight:

  • is supported by evidence
  • challenges existing assumptions
  • suggests a direction for the project

Without this phase, User Research risks producing reports nobody uses.

The most common mistakes in User Research

Even experienced teams make recurring mistakes:

  • doing research only to “confirm” ideas already decided
  • involving unrepresentative users
  • confusing preferences with needs
  • not sharing insights with the team
  • not linking research to business decisions

Avoiding these mistakes means turning User Research from a tactical activity into a strategic asset.

Conclusion: why User Research is not optional

User Research is not a phase to tick off, but a design mindset. It is what makes it possible to design with awareness, reduce risk and create experiences that truly work for people and for the business.

At Then we integrate User Research within an Experience Design approach that combines UX, CX and EX, working with senior teams and validated methodologies. If you want to understand how to apply User Research concretely to your project, let’s talk.

Sources:
Heuristic Analysis
Usability Test
Card Sorting
Personas
Eye Tracking
User Experience
A/B Test

A senior expert inside your team, starting next week.

Thirty minutes to understand the goal, then we propose the right person from the network.

Related articles
Research

UX metrics: how to measure User Experience

Which metrics really matter and how to link them to design and business decisions.
Research

Research Ops: what it is and why it is essential today

How to make user research scalable, shared and truly useful for decisions.
Research

Data Driven UX: how to design data-based experiences?

How to use quantitative and qualitative data without replacing design judgment.

Find out if we can help.

Request a free call to talk about your project.